Hoppy dispute turns litigious

New Belgium is taking another brewery to court over a beer name. Photo by Aaron Kremer.

New Belgium is taking another brewery to court over a beer name. Photo by Aaron Kremer.

A naming feud between one of Colorado’s biggest beer brands and a Texas brewery has bubbled over into court.

Fort Collins’ New Belgium Brewing sued Austin-based Oasis Brewing Co. last week, claiming that it has the rights to the name “Slow Ride” for its IPA. Oasis sells a Slow Ride pale ale around Texas.

New Belgium has asked a court to settle the dispute so that it can start distributing Slow Ride in Texas.

“We want clarification,” New Belgium spokesman Bryan Simpson said. “We’re still open to settling this out of court and a coexistence agreement. We are not trying to suppress their brand or (pursue) damages. And if we sit down to the table, we’re open to that.”

New Belgium, which expects to open a plant in Asheville, North Carolina, this fall, has been holding its Slow Ride IPA bottles out of Texas and out of sampler packs.  New Belgium said it will release the beer under the name “New Belgium Session IPA” until the issue is resolved.

New Belgium tried to sit down with Oasis in December, the suit claims. But the meeting and subsequent phone chats went nowhere.

In the two sides’ discussions, Oasis demanded that New Belgium cease and desist all further use of the Slow Ride mark, according to the lawsuit that was filed in U.S. District Court.

Read the suit (PDF)

Read the suit (PDF)

Oasis claimed in a response to the suit on its website that it’s being strong-armed by a larger brewer and said it will continue brewing and canning its Slow Ride beer.

“New Belgium Brewing keeps talking about an ‘amicable’ solution, but never stating what their idea of this actually is,” the company posted on its Facebook page. “It involved either selling our brand to them for a fraction of its worth or signing an agreement that allowed them to come into our markets with a beer of the same name – markets we had clearly established a presence in.”

The two breweries offer different timelines, but New Belgium claims it filed for a trademark for Slow Ride on May 23, 2014. Oasis said it started using the name on its cans in mid-May, before New Belgium applied for a trademark.

Oasis posted on its Facebook that it wants New Belgium to keep its Slow Ride beer out of its markets.

“This style of strong-arm intimidation should not exist in an industry whose lifeblood is communal support and collaboration,” Oasis wrote on its website. “We hope that the industry as a whole will take notice of these aggressive tactics and think twice about supporting brands that employ them.”

BusinessDen was unable to reach Oasis.

New Belgium is represented by David Sipiora from the firm Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton.

The brewery industry has had a reputation for congeniality, but that’s turning more litigious as a flood of breweries battle for clever label names.

“It’s really just math; there are 3,000 breweries with 10 brands each,” Simpson said. “So there’s going to be a lot of overlap … That’s where you’re starting to see a proliferation of contested IP (intellectual property). It’s just a sheer matter of volume.”

More Reading:
Craft Brewers Are Running Out Of Names And Into Legal Spats, NPR

New Belgium is taking another brewery to court over a beer name. Photo by Aaron Kremer.

New Belgium is taking another brewery to court over a beer name. Photo by Aaron Kremer.

A naming feud between one of Colorado’s biggest beer brands and a Texas brewery has bubbled over into court.

Fort Collins’ New Belgium Brewing sued Austin-based Oasis Brewing Co. last week, claiming that it has the rights to the name “Slow Ride” for its IPA. Oasis sells a Slow Ride pale ale around Texas.

New Belgium has asked a court to settle the dispute so that it can start distributing Slow Ride in Texas.

“We want clarification,” New Belgium spokesman Bryan Simpson said. “We’re still open to settling this out of court and a coexistence agreement. We are not trying to suppress their brand or (pursue) damages. And if we sit down to the table, we’re open to that.”

New Belgium, which expects to open a plant in Asheville, North Carolina, this fall, has been holding its Slow Ride IPA bottles out of Texas and out of sampler packs.  New Belgium said it will release the beer under the name “New Belgium Session IPA” until the issue is resolved.

New Belgium tried to sit down with Oasis in December, the suit claims. But the meeting and subsequent phone chats went nowhere.

In the two sides’ discussions, Oasis demanded that New Belgium cease and desist all further use of the Slow Ride mark, according to the lawsuit that was filed in U.S. District Court.

Read the suit (PDF)

Read the suit (PDF)

Oasis claimed in a response to the suit on its website that it’s being strong-armed by a larger brewer and said it will continue brewing and canning its Slow Ride beer.

“New Belgium Brewing keeps talking about an ‘amicable’ solution, but never stating what their idea of this actually is,” the company posted on its Facebook page. “It involved either selling our brand to them for a fraction of its worth or signing an agreement that allowed them to come into our markets with a beer of the same name – markets we had clearly established a presence in.”

The two breweries offer different timelines, but New Belgium claims it filed for a trademark for Slow Ride on May 23, 2014. Oasis said it started using the name on its cans in mid-May, before New Belgium applied for a trademark.

Oasis posted on its Facebook that it wants New Belgium to keep its Slow Ride beer out of its markets.

“This style of strong-arm intimidation should not exist in an industry whose lifeblood is communal support and collaboration,” Oasis wrote on its website. “We hope that the industry as a whole will take notice of these aggressive tactics and think twice about supporting brands that employ them.”

BusinessDen was unable to reach Oasis.

New Belgium is represented by David Sipiora from the firm Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton.

The brewery industry has had a reputation for congeniality, but that’s turning more litigious as a flood of breweries battle for clever label names.

“It’s really just math; there are 3,000 breweries with 10 brands each,” Simpson said. “So there’s going to be a lot of overlap … That’s where you’re starting to see a proliferation of contested IP (intellectual property). It’s just a sheer matter of volume.”

More Reading:
Craft Brewers Are Running Out Of Names And Into Legal Spats, NPR

Your subscription has expired. Renew now by choosing a subscription below!

For more informaiton, head over to your profile.

Profile


SUBSCRIBE NOW

 — 

 — 

 — 

TERMS OF SERVICE:

ALL MEMBERSHIPS RENEW AUTOMATICALLY. YOU WILL BE CHARGED FOR A 1 YEAR MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL AT THE RATE IN EFFECT AT THAT TIME UNLESS YOU CANCEL YOUR MEMBERSHIP BY LOGGING IN OR BY CONTACTING [email protected].

ALL CHARGES FOR MONTHLY OR ANNUAL MEMBERSHIPS ARE NONREFUNDABLE.

EACH MEMBERSHIP WILL ONLY FUNCTION ON UP TO 3 MACHINES. ACCOUNTS ABUSING THAT LIMIT WILL BE DISCONTINUED.

FOR ASSISTANCE WITH YOUR MEMBERSHIP PLEASE EMAIL [email protected]




Return to Homepage

POSTED IN Brewing

Editor's Picks

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *